As the Obama Administration pursues the latest peace
initiative in the Mideast amid renewed world hopes, it
will ultimately face once again the seemingly intractable issue of the future
status of the TempleMount
(Al Haram Al Sharif in Arabic). Situated in the center of Jerusalem,
it is the site of the Dome of Rock and the Al Aqsa Mosque, sacred to Islam, and
also the site of long-held aspirations by Jews for a rebuilt temple as
expressed to this day in daily prayers.
Contention about this spot is incongruous given its shared
spiritual significance for Jews, Muslims and Christians alike. The Dome stands
at the place where all three religions believe that Abraham was prepared to
sacrifice his son before an angel stayed his hand. The Jewish Temple, from the
initial consecration address by King Solomon onwards, was always intended to
manifest the One God for all, Jew and non-Jew alike, as well as the universal
ideal of God's moral order reigning supreme. References in sacred Jewish texts
and history to the role of non-Jews in the Temple
are numerous and striking.
But this sanctified spot was subsequently tarnished by the
destruction of the first and second temples, the latter by the Roman general
Titus in the year 70 preceded by deadly infighting of Jew against Jew. In
modern times, the Camp David
negotiations of 2000 broke down in part over the issue of the TempleMount, and the second intifada that
followed was sparked by a violent incident there. Given the conventional
assumption that Jewish law mandates the spot of the Dome as the site of a
future rebuilt temple, avoidance of this topic by all mainstream religious
bodies is understandable. But it remains a central, if unspoken, obstacle to a
peace settlement.
A recent article published in the leading journal of
religious law in Israel, Tehumin, however, opens the potential for restoring
this now-contentious spot to its original sacred role as God's Holy Mountain, a
house of prayer for all people (Isaiah 56:7). Although the arguments are
detailed and technical, the main point is that Jewish doctrine regarding the
rebuilding of the temple emphasizes the role of a prophet (one deemed authentic
by contemporaneous sages) who would have extraordinary authority, including the
discretion to specify the temple's precise location, regardless of any
diverging Jewish traditions.
This article considers the scenario of a holy revelation
given to an authentic prophet that the temple be rebuilt on the current or an
extended TempleMount
in peaceful proximity to the Dome, Al Aqsa Mosque, and nearby Christian shrines.
According to Jewish law, the article concludes, such a prophetic mandate would
then be binding. It would also be in keeping with the words of the 12th Century
Jewish sage Maimonides that Christianity and Islam are part of God's ultimate
plan "to direct the entire world to worship God together." Interestingly,
Theodore Herzl, the preeminent secular Zionist, detailed the same vision for a
rebuilt temple in peaceful proximity to Islamic and Christian shrines on what
he called "the holy region of mankind."
While compromise is admirable in the pursuit of peace, a
rebuilt temple according to this vision would be nothing of the kind. It would
be the radical fulfillment of God's original mandate to the Jewish people and
of the original purpose of the Temple,
to manifest the One God to the world. This would be more powerfully
accomplished with Christian and Muslim shrines nearby along with the pilgrims
that visit them. At the very same time, with a rebuilt Temple
in peaceful proximity, Allah would be more powerfully manifested in the Dome
and in the Al Aqsa Mosque, and likewise for God, the Prince of Peace, in
surrounding churches. All would occur simultaneously because the world would
then understand and embrace the prophecy of Zechariah 14:9, "On that day,
God will be One and His Name One."
These initial findings and the painting of this vision will
be presented at a launching event on June 18 in Jerusalem,
sponsored by the Interfaith Encounter Association. This event will be preceded
by a separate panel discussion among distinguished rabbis, sheikhs and
Christian clergy about this prophetic verse. We hope that among other potential
ultimate developments, ensuing dialogue and study can further the understanding
that Jews, Muslims and Christians were put together in the Mideast
not to acquiesce in conflict instigated by tyrants throughout history but to
fulfill the prophecy of Zechariah 14:9.
Ohr Margalit, Ph.D., teaches rabbinic studies at Bar-IlanUniversity in Israel,
is a former Harry Starr fellow at Harvard, and directs the study project described
here.